Originally posted in Commonweal By Gerald W. Schlabach May 31, 2017
What is so wrong with the just-war theory? The answer lies
in the way it overlooks and even undermines alternative approaches. The
critique that emerged at the meeting was that while many Christians have come
to assume that Jesus’ nonviolent teachings are impractical in the face of
violence, they know little about the practice, power, or effectiveness of those
teachings. When Pope John Paul II looked back on the 1989 revolution that
brought down the Soviet empire, he did not credit Ronald Reagan or Mikhail Gorbachev,
but resolute nonviolent action by ordinary people. And rightly so.
Political-science researchers Maria Stephan (a participant at the Rome
conference) and Erica Chenoweth have extensively surveyed conflicts around the
world since 1900 and found that nonviolent resistance campaigns have been twice
as successful as violent struggles.
Why have we relied on militarism and so often ignored the
power of nonviolence? Arguably, the church’s centuries-old focus on “just war”
bears great responsibility. In this view, just-war teaching has distracted
Catholics from learning, developing, and practicing strategic nonviolence. At
times it has excused them from even trying.
As an alternative, the conference called upon the Catholic
Church to shift to a “Just Peace” framework for guiding its responses to war,
violence, and injustice. Based in Gospel nonviolence, such an approach means
much more than refraining from violence; in the words of the conference’s
appeal, it offers a positive and proactive “vision and an ethic to build peace
as well as to prevent, defuse, and to heal the damage of violent conflict,”
even as it provides “specific criteria, virtues, and practices to guide our
actions.” The conference’s request and great hope was that Pope Francis would
issue an encyclical to call the church back to Jesus’ teachings and to
underscore the power of active nonviolence.
No comments:
Post a Comment